Accordingly, these bills' only real contribution to the black-letter law is to confer bald economic protectionism upon their drafters and chief proponents - a limited set of favored business enterprises - by criminalizing speech acts that are critical of their practices. corporation” or “influenc a unit of government to take a specific action.” Although the bills also address a range of destructive activities, these other provisions are merely a reiteration of existing state criminal codes. These so-called Animal and Ecological Terrorism bills would make it a felony to, among other things, “deter” the business activities of industries engaged in the exploitation of animals and natural resources by “protest the actions of a. freedom of association, including the ability to attend meetings without being monitored or belong to an organization without fear of reprisal.” The State of Hawai'i urged its Congressional delegation to work to repeal the USA Patriot Act, recalling that many of its residents, during World War II and the Japanese internment, had “experienced first hand the dangers of unbalanced pursuit of security without appropriate checks and balances for the protection of basic liberties.” ĭespite the outpouring of condemnation from anxious state and local governments, at least thirteen state legislatures, including that of Hawaii, have either passed or are currently considering *262 versions or parts of a model bill that borrows the legal framework of the USA Patriot Act and manipulates its anti-terror rhetoric to wage an even broader offensive against civil liberties. The Maine legislature, for example, found the USA Patriot Act so fearsome that it resolved, in the Act's wake, to “reaffirm sworn oaths to defend” its citizens' “freedom of expression. Since President Bush signed the USA Patriot Act into law on November 26, 2001, more than 357 legislative bodies, including four states, have passed resolutions condemning the law's encroachment upon civil liberties. In the end, the Article concludes by explaining how the bills exploit the USA Patriot Act's anti-terrorism rhetoric, and reveal a concerted corporate strategy to manipulate the term “terrorist” and capitalize on its potency, in an anticompetitive effort to secure protectionism from the adverse economic effects of criticism, protests, and boycotts.Įthan Carson Eddy Copyright (c) 2005 Pace University School of Law Ethan Carson Eddy (reprinted with permission). The Article predicts that courts will find the bills' constraints on speech to be undeniably content-based and without a sufficiently compelling state interest. It further explains the legal and rhetorical parallels between the Model Act and the USA Patriot Act. Urn:oclc:45072403 Republisher_date 20140530011028 Republisher_operator Scandate 20140514012754 Scanner Article describes the model Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act its permutations currently pending in state legislatures, its proponents, and their motivations. OL17030638W Page-progression lr Page_number_confidence 90.46 Pages 266 Ppi 500 Related-external-id urn:isbn:0072822805 Urn:lcp:takingsidesclash00geor:lcpdf:a70e65ad-463b-4ddb-abef-4b5e0d99dfdd Extramarc OhioLINK Library Catalog Foldoutcount 0 Identifier takingsidesclash00geor Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t92830b08 Invoice 11 Isbn 9780078127526Ġ073515272 Ocr_converted abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.20 Ocr_module_version 0.0.17 Openlibrary_edition Includes bibliographical references and indexĭemocracy and the American political process: Should Americans believe in a unique American "Mission"? Is democracy the answer to global terrorism? Should America adopt public financing of political campaigns - Institution of government: Does the president have unilateral war powers? Should the courts seek the "Original Meaning" of the Constitution? Is Congress a "broken branch"? Should the president be allowed "Executive privilege"? - Social change and public policy: Is homosexual conduct constitutionally protected? Does affirmative action advance racial equality? Should abortion be restricted? Should the government provide national health insurance? Is America becoming more unequal? Does the Patriot Act abridge essential freedom? Stopping illegal immigration, should border security come first? Should there be a "wall of separation" between church and state? - America and the world: Does the war in Iraq help the war against terrorism? Is "Middle Eastern" profiling ever justified? Is warrantless wiretapping in some cases justified to protect national security? Must America exercise world leadership? Should Federal taxes be increased? Does conservatism get the world wrong?Īccess-restricted-item true Addeddate 15:19:03 Boxid IA1117612 Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II City Boston, MA Donorīurlingamepubliclibrary Edition 16th ed., expanded.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |